Modifying Stress-Strain Curves Using Optimization and Finite Elements Simulation Methods

Document Type: Research Paper

Authors

1 Department of Mechanical Engineering, Khoy Branch, Islamic Azad University

2 Department of Mechanical Engineering ,Hamedan Branch ,Islamic Azad University

3 Young Researchers and Elite Club, Hamedan Branch, Islamic Azad university

Abstract

Modifying stress-strain curves is one of the important topics in mechanical engineering and materials science. Real stress-strain curves should be modified after necking point as stress becomes three-dimensional after creation of throat, and consequently, equivalent stress should be used instead of axial one. Also, distribution of triple stresses across throat section is not uniform anymore, and it is not possible to calculate the stress through dividing force value by surface area. Methods presented to modify these curves mainly have some defects which enter the error resulting from simplifying assumptions into the results. Entrance of stress analysis softwares into mechanical engineering has caused use of finite elements methods in order to modify stress-strain curves. As you know, being as an input for stress analysis software, as one of the applications of these curves, has a direct effect on simulation results. Optimization methods have been developed and extended in engineering sciences. Modifying stress-strain curves may be an application of these methods. Considering the sample shape resulting from tension test as the basis in this research, we have changed the modified stress-strain curved in a way that the shape resulting from simulation coincides with the sample resulting from the test. Accordingly, the stress-strain curve has been modified, and the results have been verified, using results obtained from normal methods such as Bridgeman method.

Keywords


[1] Bridgeman P.W., 1944, The stress distribution at the neck of a tension specimen, Transactions of American Society for Metal 32: 553-574.
[2] Davidenkov N.N., Spiridonova N.I., 1947, Mechanical method of testing analysis of the state of stress in the neck of a tension test speciement, Proceedings American Society for Testing Material 46: 1147-1158.
[3] Siebel E., Schwaigere S., 1948, Mechanics of tensile test (in German), Arch Eisenhuttenwes 19: 145-152.
[4] Leroy G., Embury J., Edwards G., Ashby M.F., 1981, A model of ductile fracture based on the nucleation and growth of voids, Acta Metallurgica 29: 1509-1522.
[5] Needleman A., 1972, A numerical study of necking in circular cylindrical bars, Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 20: 111-127.
[6] Brunig M., 1998, Numerical analysis and modeling of large deformation and necking behavior of tensile Specimens, Finite Elements in Analysis and Design 28: 303-319.
[7] Niordson C.F., Redanz P., 2004, Size effects in plane strain sheet-necking , Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 52: 2431-2454.
[8] Koc P., Stok B., 2004, Computer-aided identification of the yield curve of a sheet metal after onset of necking, Computational Materials Science 31: 155-168.
[9] Tang C.Y., Lee T.C., 2003, Simulation of necking using a damage coupled finite element method, Journal of Materials Processing Technology 139: 510-513.
[10] Yung L., 1996, Uniaxial true stress strain after necking, Journal of Technology 5: 37-48.
[11] Giuseppe M., 2004, A new model for the elasto-plastic characterization and the stress – strain determination on the necking section of a tensile specimen, International Journal of Solid and Structures 41: 3545-3564.
[12] Hung-Yang Y., Jung-Ho C., 2003, NDE of metal damage ultrasonic whit a damage mechanics model, International Journal of Solids and Structures 40: 7285-7298.
[13] ASTM, E8, Standard Methods of Tension Testing of Metallic Materials, Annual book of ASTM standard, American society for testing and materials.
[14] Majzoobi G.H. , Freshteh-Saniee F., FarajZadehKhosroshahi S., BeikMohhamadloo H., Determination of material parameter under dynamic loading part I:Experiments and simulation, Computational Materials Science 49(2):192-200.